MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126595195 · doi:10.1177/1076029610365507

Contaminants in Heparins: Are All Facts Known?

2010· letter· en· W2126595195 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jawed Fareed, Debra A. Hoppensteadt, Eduardo Ramacciotti, Russell D. Hull

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContaminationChemistryEnvironmental scienceBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

D espite several publications on the issues related to the chemical nature of the heparin contaminants and their mechanism of action in mediating the adverse reactions, many questions related to this problem have remained unresolved. Several groups of investigators have continued to work to provide additional information. However, certain stipulations and restricted availability of the contaminated heparins and blood plasma samples from patients who suffered from adverse effects have delayed this work. Although the heparin contaminant was identified to be oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS) with similar molecular weight profile to heparin, its biologic actions were not fully explored. Moreover, the main mechanism of action was stated to be the activation of the contact system leading to the formation of the mediators causing hemodynamic aberrations. It should be noted that the OSCS may have different origins and can be obtained from bovine, porcine, ovine, and other sources. In addition to differences in their molecular profile, the biologic actions may also be different. Because heparin is a polypharmacologic agent, it is no surprise that oversulfated glycosaminoglycans such as OSCS may also exert multiple effects on blood and plasmatic processes. In this issue of CATH, The Washington University Medical School group led by Dr L. Zhang reports on some additional observations gleaned from a careful analysis of the contaminants in heparin. They have found evidence of a new pathway of thrombin formation that begins with the activation of the contact system component kallikrein and leads directly to the cleavage of prothrombin. These authors showed that kallikrein can directly activate prothrombin into thrombin, which may lead to some of the processes such as the upregulation of nitric oxide and activation of platelets among other complicated processes. Additionally, these investigators have also provided evidence that besides OSCS, contaminated heparins also contain chemically modified heparin byproducts as an additional group of contaminants in recalled heparins. The suggestion that OSCS and oversulfated heparin byproducts can directly generate thrombin that may result in the activation of platelets resulting in thrombocytopenia responses also makes sense. That is why, an initial occurrence of HIT response was observed during the time of the contaminant crisis. The same group has recently reported on the identification of chemically sulfated/desulfated glycosaminoglycans in recalled heparin and development of a simple assay for the measurement of contaminants in heparins. Contaminated heparin was linked to over 100 reported deaths and several hundreds of adverse reactions. While the published reports indicated that carryover dermatan sulfate and OSCS originating from animal cartilage were the main contaminants, the 3 communications in this issue, along with other publications, clearly indicate that the OSCS is not the sole contaminant in heparin and other contaminants such as chemically modified heparin byproducts, and carryover heparin From the Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA (JW, DAH); University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI (ER); and University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada (RDH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0080.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisSame topicHeparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207