A variable neighborhood search method for multi-objective channel assignment problem in Multi-Radio WMNs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Channel assignment schemes in Multi-Radio Wireless Mesh Networks (MR-WMNs) usually leave several links sharing the same channel within overlapped transmissions or interference ranges; this is especially true when only one radio is used or when the number of radios is very small compared to the number of orthogonal channels. In this paper, we propose a new multi-objective optimization model for channel assignment (CA) performed during the MR-WMNs planning process. Given the expected traffic demand, the goal is to (1) minimize user handoff overhead; (2) minimize traffic load variances to achieve load balancing; (3) maximize overall throughput; and (4) maximize Jain's fairness index to achieve fairness among mesh clients. We also propose a variable neighborhood search (VNS) meta-heuristic to solve our model. Simulation results show that our proposed approach achieves good performance in terms of delay, loss rate, overall throughput and fairness in the MR-WMNs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".