Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compression data on over 100 sands were examined to clarify the role of particle rearrangement through interparticle slip and rotation and particle damage on primary compression, including the yield stress, secondary compression, and coefficient of lateral pressure at rest. During the increase in effective vertical stress, mechanisms such as tighter packing that promote particle locking and interparticle slip and particle damage that promote particle unlocking together determine the relationship between void ratio and effective vertical stress. Three levels of particle damage together with interparticle slip and rotation determine three types of compression behavior and a yield stress at the abrupt onset of particle fracturing and splitting. The ratio of secondary compression index to compression index is independent of whether compression results from overcoming interparticle friction through interparticle slip, from overcoming particle strength through particle damage, or both; and therefore it is a constant independent of the effective stress range. The coefficient of lateral pressure at rest of an initially dense sand starts with a value defined by the Jaky equation and the maximum friction angle and remains constant up to the abrupt onset of particle fracturing and splitting, at which point it begins to increase with an increase in effective vertical stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".