MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126617582 · doi:10.7202/019088ar

Remise en cause, reconfiguration ou recomposition ?

2008· article· fr· W2126617582 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mamadou Ndongo Dimé

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S’appuyant sur une enquête de terrain réalisée dans deux quartiers de Dakar (Sénégal) différant fortement quant à leur constitution historique et leur profil socioéconomique, cette recherche documente les nouvelles dynamiques des solidarités familiales dans un contexte global marqué par une précarité socioéconomique grandissante. Elle s’organise autour de trois éléments majeurs : la place toujours centrale occupée par les solidarités familiales, mais relevant davantage aujourd’hui du symbolique et du référentiel ; leur structuration différentielle selon la catégorie sociale, le genre et la génération ; enfin, leur mise à l’épreuve porteuse de nouvelles dynamiques. Celles-ci ont notamment trait à un renforcement de la solidarité dans l’espace conjugal, à un renversement des flux de solidarité entre « générations de la crise » et « aînés sociaux », ainsi qu’à des discours critiques débouchant sur une remise en cause des solidarités familiales avec l’apparition de nouvelles aspirations et pratiques reflétant plus la vie économique et sociale de la famille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.032
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0020.010
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.433
GPT teacher head0.554
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologie et sociétésSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207