A Bootstrap Term Selection Method for the Identification of Time-Varying Nonlinear Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most physical systems are nonlinear and often time-varying. Constructing accurate models for nonlinear systems require specialized model structures that include their nonlinearities, whereas models of time-varying systems must include the time courses of the model's parameters. This contribution implements a technique in which the time dependence of the system's parameters are modeled by projecting them onto one or more expansion bases. However, unless an appropriate set of bases is chosen, it is likely that many of the basis functions used in the expansion will not contribute appreciably to the final model and may cause inaccuracy in the parameter estimates. Our study addresses the selection of a minimal number of parameters for optimization from a basis expansion of a system's time variations. The bootstrap method is used to select significant basis coefficients and hence basis functions in order to improve the overall accuracy of the model. The performance of the algorithm is demonstrated on simulated data from a system used to model the reflex contribution to joint stiffness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it