MétaCan
← all works

Representation of agricultural conservation practices with SWAT

2007· article· en· 393 citations· W2126718509 on OpenAlex· 10.1002/hyp.6890

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian funderA Canadian agency funded it. The work may carry no Canadian affiliation at all.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread
0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Abstract Results of modelling studies for the evaluation of water quality impacts of agricultural conservation practices depend heavily on the numerical procedure used to represent the practices. Herein, a method for the representation of several agricultural conservation practices with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is developed and evaluated. The representation procedure entails identifying hydrologic and water quality processes that are affected by practice implementation, selecting SWAT parameters that represent the affected processes, performing a sensitivity analysis to ascertain the sensitivity of model outputs to selected parameters, adjusting the selected parameters based on the function of conservation practices, and verifying the reasonableness of the SWAT results. This representation procedure is demonstrated for a case study of a small agricultural watershed in Indiana in the Midwestern USA. The methods developed in the present work can be applied with other watershed models that employ similar underlying equations to represent hydrologic and water quality processes. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
Hydrological Processes
Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Field
Environmental Science
Canadian institutions
Funders
National Agricultural Statistics ServiceNatural Resources Conservation ServiceAlberta Water Research Institute
Keywords
Soil and Water Assessment ToolWatershedSWAT modelRepresentation (politics)AgricultureWater qualityHydrology (agriculture)Soil conservationEnvironmental scienceSensitivity (control systems)Work (physics)Watershed managementComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementWater resource managementQuality (philosophy)GeographyEcologyEngineeringCartographyMachine learningDrainage basinStreamflow
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes