MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exercise performance is regulated during repeated sprints to limit the development of peripheral fatigue beyond a critical threshold

2014· article· en· W2126724819 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas J. Hureau, Nicolas Olivier, Guillaume Y. Millet, Olivier Meste, Grégory M. Blain

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSprintMuscle fatigueVastus medialisMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPeripheralPhysical therapyFemoral nerveMotor unit recruitmentElectromyographyCardiologyInternal medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the central question of this study? We asked whether exercise performance is regulated during all‐out repeated sprints (involving peak cycling‐specific muscle activation and limited pacing strategy) in order to restrain the total degree of peripheral fatigue development. What is the main finding and its importance? Our results showed that power output is adjusted during repeated sprints to limit the development of peripheral fatigue to a critical threshold, independently of the degree of pre‐existing fatigue. These findings emphasize the important role of peripheral fatigue in adjustment of power output during exercise. We hypothesized that exercise performance is adjusted during repeated sprints in order not to surpass a critical threshold of peripheral fatigue. Twelve men randomly performed three experimental sessions on different days, i.e. one single 10 s all‐out sprint and two trials of 10 × 10 s all‐out sprints with 30 s of passive recovery in between. One trial was performed in the unfatigued state (CTRL) and one following electrically induced quadriceps muscle fatigue (FTNMES). Peripheral fatigue was quantified by comparing pre‐ with postexercise changes in potentiated quadriceps twitch force (ΔQtw‐pot) evoked by supramaximal magnetic stimulation of the femoral nerve. Central fatigue was estimated by comparing pre‐ with postexercise voluntary activation of quadriceps motor units. The root mean square (RMS) of the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis EMG normalized to maximal M‐wave amplitude (RMS.Mmax−1) was also calculated during sprints. Compared with CTRL condition, pre‐existing quadriceps muscle fatigue in FTNMES (ΔQtw‐pot = −29 ± 4%) resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in power output (−4.0 ± 0.9%) associated with a reduction in RMS.Mmax−1. However, ΔQtw‐pot postsprints decreased by 51% in both conditions, indicating that the level of peripheral fatigue was identical and independent of the degree of pre‐existing fatigue. Our findings show that power output and cycling EMG are adjusted during exercise in order to limit the development of peripheral fatigue beyond a constant threshold. We hypothesize that the contribution of peripheral fatigue to exercise limitation involves a reduction in central motor drive in addition to the impairment in muscular function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicSports Performance and TrainingFrench-language works237,207