Estimation of Operating Characteristics for Dependent Diagnostic Tests Based on Latent Markov Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a method for making inferences about the joint operating characteristics of multiple diagnostic tests applied longitudinally and in the absence of a definitive reference test. Log-linear models are adopted for the classification distributions conditional on the latent state, where inclusion of appropriate interaction terms accommodates conditional dependencies among the tests. A marginal likelihood is constructed by marginalizing over a latent two-state Markov process. Specific latent processes we consider include a first-order Markov model, a second-order Markov model, and a time-nonhomogeneous Markov model, although the method is described in full generality. Adaptations to handle missing data are described. Model diagnostics are considered based on the bootstrap distribution of conditional residuals. The methods are illustrated by application to a study of diffuse bilateral infiltrates among patients in intensive care wards in which the objective was to assess aspects of validity and clinical agreement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it