MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126753991 · doi:10.1109/pes.2003.1267414

An adaptive power system stabilizer using on-line self-learning fuzzy systems

2004· article· en· W2126753991 on OpenAlexaff
T. Abdelazim, O.P. Malik

Bibliographic record

Venue2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy logicController (irrigation)Gradient descentComputer scienceElectric power systemFuzzy control systemControl engineeringStabilizer (aeronautics)Adaptive controlStability (learning theory)Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemPower (physics)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Artificial neural networkMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An adaptive power system stabilizer consisting of an online identified planet model and self-learning fuzzy logic controller, for power system stabilizer (PSS) application is described in this paper. On-line model identification is used to obtain a dynamic equivalent model for the synchronous machine with respect to the rest of the system. A fuzzy controller with self-learning capability is then used to adapt the system performance. The self-learning ability of the fuzzy controller is based on the steepest descent algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed technique is demonstrated on a power system by simulation studies. Results obtained show improvement in the overall system damping characteristics using the proposed adaptive fuzzy PSS (AFPSS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491)Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207