MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126759429 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2003.810085

Fiber-pigtail-detachable plastic MiniDIL transmitter module with a tool-free optical connector

2003· article· en· W2126759429 on OpenAlexaff
Kimio Tatsuno, Kenji Harada, K. Yoshida, S. Takahashi, Hisashi Naka, S. Gardner, D.A.H. Spear, John R. Severn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPigtailCable glandInsertion lossTransmitterOptical fiberSynchronous optical networkingFiber optic splitterMaterials scienceFiberOptical attenuatorReturn lossOpticsEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsOptoelectronicsMulti-mode optical fiberFiber optic sensorPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fiber-pigtail-detachable plastic MiniDIL transmitter module using a tool-free optical connector and applicable to the OC 3 and OC 12 in the SONET/SDH standards has been developed as a cost-reducing solution. The newly developed optical connector works without a special tool to connect and disconnect it from the module. Transmitter fiber output of more than 0.4 mW, insertion loss of less than 0.3 dB, return loss of more than 55 dB, and a repeatability of more than 30 times were achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207