MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126775472 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.9800

La Capacidad Social en Torno al Agua

2010· article· fr· W2126775472 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Barkin

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resource Management and Quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La gestion de l’eau en milieu urbain reflète l’incapacité des autorités à garantir une qualité adéquate et une qualité de service tout en protégeant les écosystèmes autour duquel ils dépendent. Ce problème est exacerbé par la réticence officielle d’encourager ou de permettre la participation sociale dans la discussion pour la gestion et la supervision des services publics. L’analyse est basée sur le cadre de la Nouvelle culture de l’eau et conclut que les problèmes à identifier sont délibérément créé comme étant une stratégie pour placer l’eau aux services des élites et aux capitaux internationaux en sacrifiant les besoins sociaux de bases. Cette approche soulève les conflits sociaux et les problèmes environnementaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicWater Resource Management and QualityFrench-language works237,207