MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126803258 · doi:10.1139/v99-223

On chirality measures and chirality properties

2000· article· en· W2126803258 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsChirality (physics)Planar chiralityAxial chiralityChemistryChemical physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsEnantioselective synthesisChiral symmetryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown that chiral zeroes are integral to all pseudoscalar functions, and that these functions, and thus the chirality properties that are described by them, are therefore normally unsuitable as chirality measures. The multidimensional nature of chirality properties is explored. Chirality measures for nonrigid objects and stochastic systems are discussed. It is shown that if the chirality of a nonrigid object is described as a time average of the chirality measures of its instant configurations, this time average is nonzero not only for chiral but also for achiral molecules. This paradox can be resolved if chirality measures are properly applied to nonrigid objects.Key words: chirality, chiral zeroes, chirality measures, chirality properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it