MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126806095 · doi:10.48009/1_iis_2008_217-222

TAILORING MBA (SOFTWARE ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT) CURRICULUM: TO MEET INDIA'S GROWING IT CHALLENGES

2008· article· en· W2126806095 on OpenAlexaff
Rakesh Kumar Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueIssues in Information Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Canadian institutionsKwantlen Polytechnic University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineering managementBusinessCurriculumKnowledge managementSoftwareEngineeringProcess managementComputer scienceSociologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With India's economic growth creating a need for skilled human capital, schools are tailoring their curriculum to create a new generation of professionals who can face the emerging challenges of globalization and competition with confidence.The traditional MBA curriculum has to be redesigned to suit today's needs, which require that students be provided a balanced exposure to the latest skills in Information Technologies (IT) supported by management disciplines.The MBA (Software Enterprise Management) program at the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC), Noida, India is designed to address the specific Management and Information Technology (IT) needs of the software industry in India.This paper provides an overview of the unique MBA (Software Enterprise Management) program curriculum and discusses the approach used in integrating ERP software in the curriculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIssues in Information SystemsSame topicERP Systems Implementation and ImpactFrench-language works237,207