MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study on Cable Force Optimization for Extradosed Cable-Stayed Bridge under the Rational Completion Stage

2014· article· en· W2126813281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Mechanics and Materials · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Transportation of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Internal forcesStructural engineeringEngineeringConstraint (computer-aided design)Moment (physics)Range (aeronautics)Mechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extradosed cable-stayed bridge is a new type of bridge developed in recent year. The optimization methods commonly used are based on the cable-stayed bridge and not entirely suit for the extradosed cable-stayed bridge. The paper puts forward a new optimization method, which applies the unknown coefficient functions aided by MIDAS/CIVIL, it takes the reasonable feasible range of dead moment solved by stress balanced method as the constraint condition, makes the square of unknown coefficients as objective function, and solves the cable force based on the effect matrix method thus to determine the cable force in reasonably completion state. This new method is verified with favorable effect, the internal force of this structure appear significant improvement. And finally, the results show better cable force obtained under the method in this paper compared with the cable force under other constraint conditions and objective functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it