Between memory and longing: Rudy Wiebe's Sweeter Than All the World
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Rudy Wiebe's latest novel Sweeter Than All the World is, like his much-anthologized short story Where Is the Voice Coming From?, a meta-fiction. Like the earlier, shorter work, the novel is a meditation on how an individual might--through the mediating forces of historical artifact and mystical experience--at once encounter history and discover something about oneself. In the novel Wiebe uses particular photographs from a 1981 collection entitled Forever Summer, Forever Sunday: Peter Gerhard Rempel's Photographs of Mennnonites in Russia, 1890-1919. The photographs enable Wiebe to explore the transformative power of individual recollection (literally, re-collection: the taking up of the artifacts of the past one more time) and the role of the collective (the community and the commonly held stories and other representations of the past) in the articulation of longing and the realization of desire. There are many ways to see us. We can look elsewhere; there are mirrors ali around: let us begin with the Old Country. --David Waltner-Toews, Word in the Nest We believed it would be always summer always Sunday. On Khortiza Island we fell on our knees searching reluctant undergrowth for evidence of our having been there. Our fingers trace names once chiselled deep in weathered stone. --Sarah Klassen, Origins Presumably all the parts of the story are themselves available. A difficulty is that they are, as always, available only in bits and pieces. --Rudy Wiebe, Where Is the Voice Coming From? ********** Actual photographs--testimonies to historical circumstance--inform some of the narratives of Rudy Wiebe's Sweeter Than Ali the World. (1) The following passage from the novel, and the accompanying photograph, illustrate what I mean [Plate #1]: Father, show me a picture. Which one, sweetheart? You know, you know. You made me laugh, he says, laughing. So hard I shook the camera under the hood. You and Greta Isaak were perfect slender young men in trousers and tied cravats, flat-brimmed hats, pince-nez and twirled moustaches, superb, she in black, stood leaning towards you in grey, seated in the round-backed chair with your left leg perched at the ankle on your right knee, each of you with a long cigarette elegantly between your fingers, rolled paper actually, such beautiful young men. (2) This essay investigates the relationship between literary fiction and the photograph. It probes the nature of collective memory. It suggests that, sometimes, artifacts can engage our consciousness, invade our imagination and lead us home. Members of my own generation of Russian Mennonites, children and grandchildren of 1920s German-speaking immigrants to Canada from the Mennonite colonies of southern Ukraine (our parents called it Russia), (3) are cognizant of how far we have travelled from the richly layered religious and social ethos our parents occupied, once, and of how little material culture we can gather around us to give us a palpable sense of how they lived and who we are relative to their past--our heritage. We find ourselves pondering the limited material inheritances our forebears have passed on to us. They are primarily photographs, which are evocative and in some sense, presumably, reliable. We wonder whether these mementoes--these minor monuments--can offer us any meaningful access to a and spiritual heritage we have come to know only second-hand. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] In a very real sense people of my generation are engaging in what Marianne Hirsch calls post memory--a 'second generation' memory characterized by belatedness, secondariness, and displacements. (4) The personal of our parents and grandparents are being crowded out, Hirsch would observe, by the cultural memories that have taken their place and now tend to dominate. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it