MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126874609 · doi:10.1109/ciss.2006.286612

Vector Precoding with MMSE for the Fast Fading and Quasi-Static Multi-User Broadcast Channel

2006· article· en· W2126874609 on OpenAlexaff
Aaron Callard, Amir K. Khandani, Aladdin Saleh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecodingFadingZero-forcing precodingMIMOComputer scienceMinimum mean square errorBit error rateChannel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringInterference (communication)AlgorithmControl theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vector precoding is arguably the best form of precoding for the multi-user multiple input multiple output (MIMO) broadcast channel. However, conventional vector precoding schemes are designed to minimize the transmit energy, which is suboptimal in terms of the received signals mean square error (MSE). This paper proposes modifications to vector precoding to overcome this shortcoming. Improvements of about 2 dB are realizable in a fast fading environment. Also, conventional vector precoding schemes usually result in unbalanced levels of interference, resulting in a poor performance for some users. Noting the above, another improvement is proposed by directly minimizing the bit error rate rather than the MSE. This improvement adds another 1 dB of gain, resulting in an overall gain of 3 dB in a quasi static fading environment. These improvements are also applied to Tomlinson-Harashima precoding with similar results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207