MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2126885170 · doi:10.1109/ner.2009.5109301

Rapid detection of voluntary movements in a self-paced brain-computer interface via compressive sensing

2009· article· en· W2126885170 on OpenAlexaff
Angela Y. Chuang, Rabab Ward, Gary E. Birch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrain–computer interfaceComputer scienceInterface (matter)ElectroencephalographyCompressed sensingSIGNAL (programming language)Data compressionArtificial intelligenceCompression (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionComputer visionNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study employs compressive sensing (CS) for accelerating the overall data processing in a brain-computer interface (BCI). CS is a joint signal acquisition and compression scheme. By projecting EEG data streams onto a lower dimensional basis that is incoherent with their inherent structure, CS compresses the data and preserves their salient information. This paper presents a novel self-paced BCI (SBCI) that extracts compact and relevant features from EEG using CS. To detect an intentional control (IC) state from user's EEG, the signal structure of a specific voluntary movement that is common in all trials is identified. This compressed subset of basis functions is constructed during the BCIs training mode and is then used to acquire features during its testing mode. Experimental results show that our proposed method can efficiently detect voluntary movements for a SBCI, with potential speed increases up to 12 times from the state-of-art prototype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→