MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126894205 · doi:10.5539/jsd.v5n1p128

The Sustainable Development System Structural Model of Shaanxi Coal Industry

2011· article· en· W2126894205 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Li Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeomechanics and Mining Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalSustainable developmentBusinessResource (disambiguation)Environmental economicsStructural equation modelingCoal miningNatural resource economicsEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEconomicsEngineeringWaste managementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the author uses the Interpretative Structural Modeling Method (ISM) to analyze the factors of sustainable development system of Shaanxi coal industry. Take the environmental capacity, economic development, social development, and resources capacity as the first-grade indicator system, and environmental protection measures, clean coal technology, coal utilization, clean mining technology, management innovation, technology innovation, and coal resource management as the second-grade indicator system. Build a reach ability matrix to reflect the relationships of all factors in the system and form a structural model for the sustainable development system of Shaanxi coal industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable DevelopmentSame topicGeomechanics and Mining EngineeringFrench-language works237,207