Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article tente de définir, à partir du modèle théorique sémiotique, certains aspects de la symbolique humaniste incarnée dans la littérature jésuite illustrée du xvii e siècle. Un premier moment est la présentation de quelques contributions sémiotiques liées à l’exploration du champ sémantique du mot « symbole », en distinguant en particulier les contributions de Saussure, Hjelmslev et Todorov, et en retravaillant le couple conceptuel de « mode symbolique » et « mode allégorique » de signification secondaire, proposé par Eco. Deuxièmement, on observe la prévalence du mode allégorique dans cette partie de l’ épistémè renaissante et baroque appelée « symbolique humaniste », en vérifiant aussi l’existence constante, au cours de l’histoire, de la tension entre le deux « modes ». Enfin, l’analyse textuelle de quelques images symboliques provenant de deux ouvrages jésuites du xvii e siècle permet de retrouver cette tension dans un corpus textuel spécifique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".