MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126910199 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4353522

Spectral Clustering of fMRI Data within Regions of Interest: Clarification of L-dopa effects in Parkinson's Disease

2007· article· en· W2126910199 on OpenAlex
Pamela Wen-Hsin Lee, Zhu Wang, Samantha J. Palmer, Martin J. McKeown

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoxelCluster analysisArtificial intelligenceRegion of interestPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceCorrelationSimilarity (geometry)Functional magnetic resonance imagingSpectral clusteringRegressionPsychologyNeuroscienceMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identifying active regions of the brain that are task-related is important in fMRI study. Current methods of determining functional Regions of Interest (ROIs) are unsatisfactory because they either reduce the effect size or bias the statistical results. We propose a spectral clustering method for assessing those voxels within an ROI that are suitable for further task-activation analysis. Different similarity functions are studied and the correlation index is chosen based on the simulation study. In real fMRI study, further group analysis employing regression is investigated to identify different brain activation patterns between groups in order to reveal the effects of disease and medicine. A real fMRI case study in Parkinson's disease suggests that the technique is promising, warranting further study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it