MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intracellular Action of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Accounts for Acute Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury

2002· article· en· W2126910504 on OpenAlexaff
Wenjie Wang, Costas Schulze, Wilma L. Suarez‐Pinzon, Jason R.B. Dyck, Grzegorz Sawicki, Richard Schulz

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsThe King's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocardial ischemiaReperfusion injuryIschemiaMatrix metalloproteinaseCardiologyIntracellularMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryInternal medicinePharmacologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Matrix metalloproteinases are best recognized for their ability to degrade the extracellular matrix in both physiological and pathological conditions. However, recent findings indicate that some of them are also involved in mediating acute processes such as platelet aggregation and vascular tone. The acute contractile defect of the heart after ischemia-reperfusion may involve the proteolytic degradation of the thin filament protein troponin I; however, the protease responsible for this remains obscure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here we report that matrix metalloproteinase-2 is colocalized with troponin I within the thin myofilaments of cardiomyocytes in ischemic-reperfused hearts and that troponin I is a novel intracellular target for proteolytic cleavage by matrix metalloproteinase-2. Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity prevented ischemia-reperfusion-induced troponin I degradation and improved the recovery of mechanical function of the heart. CONCLUSIONS: These data reveal for the first time a novel molecular mechanism by which matrix metalloproteinase-2 causes acute myocardial dysfunction after ischemia-reperfusion-injury and that matrix metalloproteinase-2 has a biological action within the cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations482
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207