Enhancing electrical properties of <scp>MWCNT</scp> s in immiscible blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and styrene‐acrylonitrile copolymer by selective localization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were introduced into poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and styrene‐acrylonitrile copolymer (SAN) blends by melt mixing in an asymmetric miniature mixer (APAM). A composition of 70 wt% of PMMA and 30 wt% of SAN was mixed to create a co‐continuous morphology. Transmission electron microscopy images of ultra‐microtomed samples (70 nm in thickness) showed selective localization of MWCNTs inside the percolated SAN phase. The occurrence of the double percolation phenomenon resulted in lower electrical percolation thresholds of PMMA/SAN/MWCNT blends molded at high temperatures. Dielectric spectroscopy indicated a higher electrical permittivity for samples that were compression molded at 260°C. Due to the higher affinity of MWCNTs to SAN, there was a migration of MWCNTs into the SAN phase during the melt processing. Conductivity measurements revealed a significant decrease in electrical percolation threshold (0.4 wt%) for PMMA70/SAN30 blends compared with MWCNT‐filled SAN and MWCNT‐filled PMMA (ca. 0.8 wt%). POLYM. COMPOS., 37:1523–1530, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".