Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaYork UniversityUniversity of ReginaUniversity of VictoriaMcGill UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalTRIUMFCarleton UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaH. Lundbeck A/SState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueGeorgian National Science FoundationCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueIsrael Science FoundationIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoLundbeckfondenLeverhulme TrustGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekAustrian Science FundBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Science CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungEuropean CommissionNational Science FoundationAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFMax-Planck-GesellschaftRoyal SocietyDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiCERNComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaDanmarks GrundforskningsfondServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi Kurumu
KeywordsNeutralinoParticle physicsPhysicsSupersymmetryPair productionNuclear physicsLarge Hadron ColliderCharm quarkQuarkMinimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexSearch for pair-produced third-generation squarks decaying via charm quarks or in compressed supersymmetric scenarios in pp collisions at ffiffi s p 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it