MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126974394 · doi:10.1211/0022357023376

On the stability of Insulin delivered through a new glucose-responsive polymeric composite membrane

2004· article· en· W2126974394 on OpenAlexafffund
Kai Zhang, Changling Quan, Huiyu Huang, Nicolas Taulier, Xiao Yu Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship CouncilUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsInsulinMembranePulmonary surfactantInsulin deliveryChemistryChromatographyDenaturation (fissile materials)Circular dichroismMaterials scienceBiophysicsChemical engineeringInternal medicineBiochemistryDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyMedicineNuclear chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new glucose-responsive polymeric composite membrane that provided pulsatile insulin release was developed in our laboratory previously. To develop a clinically useful insulin delivery system, this study was designed to investigate factors influencing insulin stability during delivery by this membrane. The effects of stirring, release duration, insulin concentration and surfactant on insulin stability were studied under both incubation and delivery conditions in a buffer solution at 37 degrees C. The structural change of insulin was characterized by reverse-phase HPLC and circular dichroism. Hydrophobicity of various contact surfaces was determined by contact angle measurement. The results indicated that insulin concentration played an important role in the insulin stability, followed by stirring. Treating the membrane with a non-ionic surfactant prevented insulin denaturation during delivery through the membrane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmacy and PharmacologySame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207