MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127004595 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2013.2285237

Pairwise Three-Dimensional Shape Context for Partial Object Matching and Retrieval on Mobile Laser Scanning Data

2013· article· en· W2127004595 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersXiamen University
KeywordsShape contextPoint cloudPairwise comparisonArtificial intelligenceContext (archaeology)Computer visionActive shape modelHistogramMatching (statistics)Computer scienceOrientation (vector space)Pattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsHeat kernel signatureTopology (electrical circuits)Spatial contextual awarenessManifold (fluid mechanics)GeometryImage (mathematics)SegmentationCombinatoricsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel pairwise 3-D shape context for partial object matching and retrieval is developed for extracting 3-D light poles and trees from mobile laser scanning (MLS) point clouds in a typical urban street scene. Unlike the single-point shape context describing only the local topology of a shape, the pairwise 3-D shape context can simultaneously model the local and global geometric structures of a shape in manifold space. By using histogram descriptors, the pairwise 3-D shape context has such characteristics as invariance to scale, invariance to orientation, and partial insensitivity to topological changes. Our results show that 3-D light poles and individual trees can be extracted from the RIEGL VMX-450 MLS point clouds and the performance achieved using our algorithm is much more accurate and effective than those of the other two existing algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it