MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127033147 · doi:10.1109/cidm.2009.4938666

Fuzzy p-mode prototypes: A generalization of frequency-based cluster prototypes for clustering categorical objects

2009· article· en· W2127033147 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy clusteringCluster analysisCategorical variablePattern recognition (psychology)FLAME clusteringFuzzy logicGeneralizationFuzzy setArtificial intelligenceMathematicsData miningComputer scienceFeature (linguistics)CURE data clustering algorithmMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency-based cluster prototypes were developed in to cluster categorical objects, based on the simple matching dissimilarity measure. This paper describes a generalization of the frequency-based prototypes in the same framework of the fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm for the objects of mixed features. In the general fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm, a cluster prototype, called fuzzy p-mode prototype, at the categorical feature level is expressed as a list of p labels that have larger frequencies than others. The convergence of the general fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm under the optimization framework is proved. It is also explained through experiments over real object sets that sizes of fuzzy p-mode prototypes and fuzzification coefficients affect clustering performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.798

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Clustering Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207