Resistance to Antimony and Treatment Failure in Human <i>Leishmania (Viannia)</i> Infection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Failure of antimonial therapy has been increasingly reported in anthroponotic visceral leishmaniasis and in cutaneous disease. The role of drug resistance in treatment failure has been difficult to ascertain because therapeutic response is multifactorial, and the efficacy of antimonial drugs depends on an effective immune response. In this study, we sought to determine whether standard treatment selects for resistant organisms and whether drug resistance contributes to treatment failure. METHODS: We evaluated the susceptibility to antimony of 19 strains isolated before treatment with meglumine antimoniate and 21 strains isolated at treatment failure from 20 patients. The 50% effective dose (ED50) of antimony in the form of additive-free meglumine antimoniate was determined for intracellular amastigotes in human promonocytic U-937 cells. RESULTS: Before treatment, 16% of strains (3/19) showed primary resistance (ED50 of >128 microg Sb/mL), whereas 84% (16/19) were susceptible (ED50 of <20 microg Sb/mL). However, 88% of susceptible strains (14/16) had ED90 values of >128 microg Sb/mL. At treatment failure, 40% of strains (8/20) were resistant. Secondary resistance was documented in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Primary and secondary resistance to antimony can contribute to treatment failure in American cutaneous leishmaniasis. Selection for resistance to antimony occurs during standard treatment with antimonial drugs, and primary resistance to antimony supports the plausibility of anthroponotic transmission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it