MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127056405 · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4353486

Automated Method for Clinic and Morphologic Analysis of Bones Using Implicit Modeling Technique

2007· article· en· W2127056405 on OpenAlexaff
Imed Gargouri, Jacques A. de Guise

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepresentation (politics)Computer scienceHeuristicCartesian coordinate systemFunction (biology)AlgorithmMedial axisArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone morphology and moprhometric estimation provide important and useful information for computed assisted-surgery, follow-up evaluation and personalized prosthesis design. Obtaining this data without any operator supervision or setting remains a practical goal. We present here an automated method that estimates clinic, anatomic and morphometric parameters based on bone-mesh representation. The method uses 2 steps. In the first one, the bone of interest is introduced as an implicit function modeling its morphology as a quadric surface. This function blends together basic geometries such as spheres, cylinders, quadratics and superquadratics and approximates its external shape. Given a mesh representation of a patient-bone, Levenber-Marquardt optimization technique computes Cartesian coordinates of the basic geometries. In second step, heuristic plans use these spatial data to locate, through the mesh representation, punctual landmarks. In order to compute subsequently complex clinic and anatomic landmarks relatives to axes, curves, surfaces, and regions, compound-heuristic plans are dressed using implicit parameters and previous punctual landmarks. Each plan is expressed as a energy-cost function that involves geometric, radial and normal terms. The method has been successfully used to locate clinic, anatomic and morphometric parameters of femur bone. Validation of the technique is performed with qualitative and quantitative procedures. A total of 9 femurs are reconstructed using a retroprojection technique. In all models, the method converges to the same parameters with acceptable clinical accuracy. As automated method, this schema presents practical advantage and remains sufficiently general to be applied to other bones and tracks most of anatomic parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedingsSame topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207