Parenthood and Parenting in Modern Russia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The second half of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries saw massive transformations in differentdomains of public life which significantly affected families as well. Sociological studies have discoveredbehavioral norms behind relationships in families and marriages being washed out, transformation in familyroles, development of new norms and principles which come as a basis for matrimonial, parent-child andintergenerational relationships. The modern society experienced a critical shift in gender roles or parents. Therole of a father and a male is losing its value. Some of the reasons are that in case of divorce in Russia childrenmost usually stay with mothers.Russian parents inherit family practices from their own parents and modify them in accordance with their ownexperience and feeling what would be most beneficial for their children. Parenting styles in Russia are based onRussian mentality, way of life, traditions and current environmental situation and thus may differ from theparenting patters of other countries.To analyze transformations in parenthood and parenting in a modern Russianfamily the paper refers to a study “Parenthood, upbringing and childhood in a modern Russian family”(Novgorod, 2013).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".