MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127065033 · doi:10.1109/tdc.2012.6281413

Low-cost amorphous-metal rolled-up-core distribution transformer

2012· article· en· W2127065033 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bruno Francoeur, Pierre Couture

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic coilTransformerRibbonDelta-wye transformerDistribution transformerMagnetic coreEnergy efficient transformerElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceAmorphous solidMechanical engineeringEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The technology of an amorphous-metal rolled-up-core distribution transformer is under development at Hydro-Québec. This transformer, a core-type configuration, comprises a magnetic core made of a flexible annealed amorphous-metal ribbon rolled up around the coils. The coils and core are mounted on a molded skeleton fulfilling multiple functions, namely a winding frame, coil and core support, coil cooling, and anchoring to the tank. This topology provides efficient cooling of the coils, comprises non-bulky interlacing connections, and incorporates preformed secondary lead terminals ready to connect with the tank bushings. The technology allows automated manufacturing processes and mass production of generic designs of transformer kernels (core and coil only) at the DOE baseline efficiency level for transformer power ratings up to 100 kVA. Flexible annealed amorphous-metal ribbon could be supplied from the casting plant to a few component manufacturers which would mass-produce transformer kernels that would then be shipped to transformer assemblers for final tanking according to local utility specifications. These generic transformer kernels would be cost competitive with foreign production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous AlloysFrench-language works237,207