MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127098172 · doi:10.1175/2011mwr3533.1

Toward a Multiscale Approach for Computational Atmospheric Modeling

2011· article· en· W2127098172 on OpenAlexaff
Jahrul Alam

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletGridComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)Atmospheric modelStability (learning theory)AlgorithmAtmospheric modelsApplied mathematicsAtmosphere (unit)MeteorologyMathematicsGeologyPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Atmospheric motions are generally characterized by a wide range of multiple length and time scales, and a numerical method must use a fine grid to resolve such a wide range of scales. Furthermore, a very fine grid requires an extremely small time step in order to keep explicit time integration schemes stable. Therefore, high-resolution meteorological simulations are very expensive. A novel multiscale modeling approach is, therefore, presented for simulating atmospheric flows. In this approach, a prognostic variable representing a highly intermittent multiscale feature is decomposed into a significant and a nonsignificant part using wavelets, where the significant part is represented by a small fraction of the wavelet modes. The proposed multiscale methodology has been verified for simulating three cases: Smolarkiewicz’s deformational flow model, warm thermals in a dry atmosphere, and the dynamics of a vortex pair with ambient stable stratification. Comparisons with benchmark simulations and with a reference model are evidence for the convergence and stability of the proposed model. The comparison with the reference model has revealed that about 93% of the grid points are not necessary to resolve the significant motion in a warm thermal simulation, saving about 96% of the CPU time. Moreover, the CPU time varies linearly with the number of significant wavelet modes, showing that the present fully implicit adaptive model is asymptotically optimal for this simulation. These primary results point toward the benefit of constructing multiscale atmospheric models using the adaptive wavelet methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Weather ReviewSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207