MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Rethinking Canada: The Promise of Women's History</i> ‐ Edited by Veronica Strong‐Boag, Mona Gleason and Adele Perry

2006· article· en· W2127138225 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGender & History · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ely Cathedral is an important architectural feature of the English landscape, and its patron, AEthelthryth (d.679), an East Anglian princess, was founder of a monastery there.Through royal and episcopal patronage, the monastery (which was refounded c.971) became one of the very richest houses.Norman abbots embraced Ely's Saxon heritage, supporting AEthelthryth's cult, as well as the cults of her sisters and nieces.The most significant wave of cult-building occurred during the twelfth century, when a number of hagiographical texts were generated to support Ely's new status as an episcopal see.This historical overview provides the context for Rosalind C. Love's edition.Her book, which is focused on the hagiographer Goscelin of Saint-Bertin (fl.1060-1090), seeks to identify the narratives about Ely saints that he produced, as well as to make these previously unedited texts available.The vitae, lessons and miracle stories feature three sisters, AEthelthryth, Seaxburh and Wihtburh, and Seaxburh's daughter and granddaughter, Eormenhild and Waerburh.With the exception of Waerburh, these women were buried at Ely, and at an important ceremony in 1106, the four royal tombs were arranged in front of the high altar to signify the genealogical history of the foundation.Most of the narratives edited in Love's collection were produced just prior to this event, and they demonstrate how a cult centre buttressed its reputation through the dissemination of hagiographical texts.The publication of Love's book in the same year as Writing the Wilton Women: Goscelin's Legend of Edith and Liber Confortatorius, edited by Stephanie Hollis (Turnhout: Brepols, 2004) indicates a growing interest in Goscelin of Saint-Bertin, a prolific, itinerant hagiographer of the late eleventh century.Love only briefly addresses Goscelin's biography, and this is a drawback to this otherwise excellent book: the hagiographer remains in the background as his narratives about the Ely women are highlighted.Love's editions include lections for Seaxburh and Eormenhild; lives for Waerburh and Wihtburh; and two pieces that cannot confidently be attributed to Goscelin, a life of Seaxburh and a collection of miracles about AEthelthryth.There is evidence, moreover, that Goscelin also produced a now-lost life about Ely's founder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it