MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Shore platform and cliff notch transitions along the La Paz Peninsula, southern Baja, Mexico

2015· article· en· W2127140447 on OpenAlex
Alan S. Trenhaile, N.I. Porter, Kyle J. Prestanski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevistes Científiques de la University of Barcelona (University of Barcelona) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyShoreGeomorphologyErosionCliffOceanographyPeninsulaGeotechnical engineeringSeismologyPaleontologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing exposure to wave action produces a northerly transition from high tidal notches to shore platforms in the andesitic lahar deposits of the La Paz Peninsula, southern Baja, Mexico.Twenty-four notches were surveyed and wear pins were cemented into the apex of each notch.Thirty-six transverse micro-erosion meter (TMEM) stations were installed on three surveyed platforms.Field measurements were made over a 2.5 year period.The wear pins suggested notch backwearing (horizontal erosion) is <2mm yr -1.The shore platforms were fairly narrow (a few tens of metres) and steeper (1) than most platforms in similar microtidal environments, reflecting a weak wave environment and resistant rocks.Mean TMEM downwearing (vertical erosion) rates for each of the three platforms ranged from 0.14mm yr -1 to 0.42mm yr -1 .There was a good relationship between notch height (difference in elevation between the floor and the roof at the front of the notch) and exposure to wave action, but notch depth is time-dependent and the relationship with exposure was not statistically significant.Notch height was also related to the orientation and wave fetch of the site.Field evidence suggested that the notches were not produced by bioerosion or chemical weathering but by alternate wetting and drying or salt weathering from high tidal immersion and wave-generated splash and spray.Coastal morphology is fairly well adjusted to present sea level although notch occurrence in the upper portion of the high tidal zone suggests that there is slow tectonic uplift in this region.Notches.Shore platforms.Erosion rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it