MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127146153 · doi:10.1007/1-4020-7991-5_6

SPACE: A Hardware/Software SystemC Modeling Platform Including an RTOS

2006· book-chapter· en· W2127146153 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystemCComputer scienceEmbedded systemTransaction-level modelingDesign space explorationSoftwarePartition (number theory)Embedded softwareAbstractionReal-time operating systemComputer architectureOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work attempts to enhance the support of embedded software modeling with SystemC 2.0. We propose a top-down approach that first lets designers specify their application in SystemC at a high abstraction level through a set of connected modules, and simulate the whole system. Then, the application is partitioned in two parts: software and hardware modules. Each partition can be connected to our platform that includes a commercial RTOS executed by an ARM ISS scheduled by the SystemC simulator. One of our major contributions is that we can easily move a module from hardware to software (and vice versa) to allow architectural exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0070.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it