MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127151194 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2006.875461

Substrate integrated image guide (SIIG)-a planar dielectric waveguide technology for millimeter-wave applications

2006· article· en· W2127151194 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Patrovsky, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtremely high frequencyLaminationMaterials scienceDielectricPlanarPermittivitySubstrate (aquarium)FabricationAttenuationOptoelectronicsSiliconWaveguideElectronic engineeringDielectric lossCoplanar waveguideMicrowaveOpticsComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunicationsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A synthesized version of the standard dielectric image guide, called the substrate integrated image guide (SIIG), is proposed and presented. It provides numerous advantages related to fabrication precision, design flexibility, and assembly cost, whereas it still retains the low-loss properties of its conventional counterpart in the millimeter-wave range. This is achieved by artificially lowering the effective dielectric permittivity around a guiding channel through cutting a periodic pattern of air holes in a single high-permittivity substrate. In this way, entire circuits including millimeter-wave components can be fabricated and assembled subsequently by a lamination process. Details on the propagation properties of the SIIG and design rules are presented. Two different simulation approaches, which have proven useful for analysis are described, and theoretical results are validated by measurements of fabricated prototypes. It is shown that guide attenuation values as low as 35 dB/m or 0.07 dB//spl lambda//sub g/ at 94 GHz can be obtained in practice with high-resistivity silicon as a substrate material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207