MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127158394

Population dynamics and seasonal lipid cycles in hyperbenthic crustaceans from a cold-ocean environment (Conception Bay, Newfoundland): Mysis mixta (Mysidacea) and Acanthostepheia malmgreni (Amphipoda)

2004· dissertation· en· W2127158394 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Nicole Bertine Richoux

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBayMysidaceaBiologyPopulationDominance (genetics)EcologyCrustaceanAmphipodaZoologyOceanographyDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Life cycles and seasonal changes in density, biomass, growth, secondary production and lipids in Mysis mixta and Acanthostepheia malmgreni from a 240-m deep site in Conception Bay, Newfoundland, were studied from October 1998 to November 2000. The primary aim was to provide life-history and ecological information on populations inhabiting the hyperbenthos of Conception Bay, and to relate the seasonal lipid and fatty acid dynamics to each species' life cycle and to the occurrence and quality of the annual phytoplankton bloom. -- Life spans and reproductive cycles were remarkably similar in the two species, with the release of free-living juveniles from mature females occurring in April and May when bloom material was settling to the hyperbenthos. Females reproduced once and then died at age-2.5 years following a 5-month brooding period of larval stages. The biennial life cycles of both populations resulted in the presence of 2 cohorts of each species co-existing at most times, although a marked annual alternation in cohort dominance occurred in the amphipod population. Annual production:biomass (P/B) ratios in the mysid population were similar in both years, indicating consistent recruitment from year to year. In contrast, the alternation in cohort strength in A. malmgreni had significant repercussions in the success of this population, reflected in a lower P/B ratio in 1999 than in 2000. -- Divergent patterns in lipids, fatty acids, and specific fatty acid marker ratios reflected differing life styles, diets and critical periods of energy accumulation and utilisation in M. mixta and A. malmgreni . Influenced by the seasonally productive and perpetually cold environment created by the Labrador Current, M. mixta and A. malmgreni both accumulated high levels of lipid reserves similar to those attained by other cold-water zooplankton. Maximum lipid stores were observed in females, although the maximum lipid content in M. mixta was over twice that in A. malmgreni. Lipid levels increased with maturity, and developing mysids exhibited a particularly rapid accumulation of triacylglycerols and diatom-associated fatty acids at the start of the spring bloom. Unlike the mysids, juvenile amphipods did not begin to develop sexual characteristics or accumulate significant amounts of triacylglycerol or phytoplanktonic fatty acids until after the spring bloom material had already reached the hyperbenthos in May. This study reveals a dependence of M. mixta and A. malmgreni on seasonal lipid accumulation for reproduction, and the existence of trophic links between their populations and the pelagic production cycle (i.e. benthic-pelagic coupling). Increased mobility and a broad range of prey types provided M. mixta with sufficient opportunities to accumulate essential fatty acids rapidly. However, A. malmgreni was restricted to a lower quality diet than was M. mixta, and the trophic connection between A. malmgreni and production in the euphotic zone was less pronounced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchFrench-language works237,207