MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127193339 · doi:10.1086/497917

The Fourth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

2006· article· en· W2127193339 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Adelman-McCarthy, Marcel A. Agüeros, S. Allam, Kurt S. Anderson, Scott F. Anderson, James Annis, Neta A. Bahcall, I. K. Baldry, John C. Barentine, Andreas A. Berlind, Mariangela Bernardi, Michael R. Blanton, William N. Boroski, H. Brewington, J. Brinchmann, J. Brinkmann, Robert J. Brunner, Tamás Budavári, Larry Carey, Michael A. Carr, Andrew J. Connolly, István Csabai, Paul C. Czarapata, Julianne J. Dalcanton, Mamoru Doi, Feng Dong, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Michael L. Evans, Xiaohui Fan, Douglas P. Finkbeiner, S. D. Friedman, Joshua A. Frieman, M. Fukugita, Bruce Gillespie, Karl Glazebrook, Jim Gray, E. K. Grebel, James E. Gunn, Vijay K. Gurbani, E. de Haas, Patrick B. Hall, Frederick H. Harris, Michael Harvanek, S. L. Hawley, J. J. E. Hayes, John S. Hendry, G. S. Hennessy, Robert B. Hindsley, Christopher M. Hirata, Craig J. Hogan, David W. Hogg, D. Holmgren, Jon A. Holtzman, Shinichi Ichikawa, Željko Ivezić, Sebastian Jester, David E. Johnston, A. M. Jorgensen, Mario Jurić, S. Kent, S. J. Kleinman, G. R. Knapp, A. Y. Kniazev, Richard G. Kron, J. Krzesiński, N. Kuropatkin, Donald Q. Lamb, Hubert Lampeitl, Brian Lee, R. French Leger, H. Lin, Daniel C. Long, J. Loveday, Robert H. Lupton, B. Margon, David Martínez‐Delgado, Rachel Mandelbaum, Takahiko Matsubara, P. McGehee, Timothy A. McKay, Avery Meiksin, Jeffrey A. Munn, Reiko Nakajima, Thomas Nash, Eric H. Neilsen, Heidi Jo Newberg, Peter R. Newman, R. C. Nichol, Tom Nicinski, M. A. Nieto‐Santisteban, A. Nitta, William O’Mullane, Sadanori Okamura, Russell Owen, Nikhil Padmanabhan, George Pauls, J. Peoples, Jeffrey R. Pier, Adrian Pope, D. Pourbaix, Thomas Quinn, Gordon T. Richards, M. Richmond, Constance M. Rockosi, David J. Schlegel, Donald P. Schneider, Joshua Schroeder, Ryan Scranton, Uroš Seljak, E. Sheldon, K. Shimasaku, J. A. Smith, V. Smolčić, Stephanie A. Snedden, Chris Stoughton, Michael A. Strauss, Mark SubbaRao, Alexander S. Szalay, István Szapudi, Paula Szkody, Max Tegmark, Aniruddha R. Thakar, D. L. Tucker, Alan Uomoto, D. E. vanden Berk, Jan Vandenberg, Michael S. Vogeley, W. Voges, Nicole P. Vogt, Lucianne M. Walkowicz, David H. Weinberg, Andrew A. West, Simon D. M. White, Yongzhong Xu, B. Yanny, D. R. Yocum, Donald G. York, Idit Zehavi, S. Zibetti, D. B. Zucker

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkyQuasarPhysicsGalaxyAstrophysicsStarsAstronomyRedshiftMilky WayData qualityDigital dataComputer scienceTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the Fourth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), including all survey-quality data taken through 2004 June. The data release includes five-band photometric data for 180 million objects selected over 6670 deg 2 and 673,280 spectra of galaxies, quasars, and stars selected from 4783 deg 2 of those imaging data using the standard SDSS target selection algorithms. These numbers represent a roughly 27% increment over those of the Third Data Release; all the data from previous data releases are included in the present release. The Fourth Data Release also includes an additional 131,840 spectra of objects selected using a variety of alternative algorithms, to address scientific issues ranging from the kinematics of stars in the Milky Way thick disk to populations of faint galaxies and quasars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,152
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207