MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127216604

De "átomos para la paz" a los reactores de potencia: Tecnología y política nuclear en la Argentina (1955-1976)

2005· article· es· W2127216604 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad - CTS · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTwentieth Century Scientific Developments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreatyContext (archaeology)Nuclear weaponAtomic energyPolitical scienceNuclear powerCommissionPoliticsHumanitiesInternational tradeEconomic historyEconomyLawGeographyNuclear physicsHistorySociologyPhysicsEconomicsArchaeologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the 1955-76 period, Argentina’s nuclear program entered the international arena, as the Argentine Atomic Energy Commission constructed four research reactors, purchased the first power reactor Atucha I from a German firm, put it into operation and acquired a second power reactor from a Canadian firm. This article examines these developments in connection with the unstable local political context and the international nuclear landscape. Particularly, it analyzes Argentine diplomatic policy opposing to Tlatelolco Treaty (1967) and Non Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty (1968) and the consequences derived from international pressures following India’s atomic explosion in 1974. Finally, Argentina’s nuclear program expectations are compared with those claimed by Brazil and Mexico in the early the 1970s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it