Integrated radar systems for precision monitoring of heartbeat and respiratory status
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents simulation and measurement results of the vital sign parameters based on low-power microwave and millimeter-wave monitoring systems through Doppler radar techniques. The cardiac beating and the breathing of patients are examined. Three systems operating at 5.8 GHz, 24 GHz and 35 GHz, respectively, are designed, simulated, and fabricated. Using such three systems and applying signal processing techniques, measured signals obtained at distance up to 1 m from the patient of reference are presented. These results show that the heartbeat and the frequency of breath are well detected which validates our radar analysis and design approach. Performances (sensitivity, complexity, etc.) of the different systems are compared and studied, showing that the highest sensitivity detection can be achieved with the system at the highest frequency (35 GHz) in this case.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it