Real-Time Energy Storage Management With Renewable Integration: Finite-Time Horizon Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the design of cost-effective management of energy storage with renewable integration for load supply. We take a finite time horizon approach and formulate the control optimization problem aimed at minimizing the system cost over a fixed time period. Recognizing the unpredictable and nonstationary stochastic nature of system dynamics, we assume unknown arbitrary dynamics of renewable generation, load, and electricity pricing in formulating our problem. Furthermore, we incorporate detailed battery operation cost into the system cost. Different from the infinite time horizon problems in existing works, the coupling of control decisions over time, due to finite battery capacity, is more challenging to manage. We develop a special technique to tackle the technical challenges in solving the problem. Through problem modification and transformation, we are able to apply Lyapunov optimization to design a real-time control algorithm that relies only on the current system dynamics. The proposed control solution has a closed-form expression and thus is simple to implement. Through analysis, the proposed algorithm is shown to have a bounded performance gap to the optimal noncausal T-slot lookahead control policy. Simulation studies show the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm as compared with two alternative real-time and noncausal algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".