MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127299225 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.227801

The vagus and the heart: revisiting an early contribution to a still on‐going dispute

2012· letter· en· W2127299225 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
O. F. Hutter

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryIonic bondingInternal medicineBiophysicsNeuroscienceMedicineIonPsychologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The early 1950s saw not only the advent of the ionic theory of the nerve impulse and the elucidation of the ionic permeability increase underlying the end-plate potential, but also the first explanation in ionic terms of the inhibitory action of the vagus on the heart. The credit for that latter insight belongs to Arnold Burgen & Kathleen Terroux (1953), who at that time worked in Montreal. Using the then novel glass micropipette electrode to record from cat auricle fibres, they found that under the influence of acetylcholine (ACh) or carbamylcholine (CCh) the resting potential increased. Moreover, on varying [K+]o they found that under the influence of CCh, chosen because of its greater stability, the behaviour of the atrial cell membrane approximated more closely to that of a potassium electrode. Together with an observed decrease in the chronaxie – an indirect measure of the membrane time constant – this led Burgen and Terroux to suggest that muscarinic agents cause an increase in the permeability of the membrane to potassium ions and hence an increase in the resting membrane conductance. Insightful and influential as Burgen & Terroux's conclusion was, their work left room for more direct studies of the effects of vagus stimulation on cardiac pacemaker fibres. With a theoretical explanation now to hand, this was essentially a technical, if a necessary, challenge. It was met by Del Castillo & Katz (1955) working in London, and independently by Hutter & Trautwein (1955, 1956) working at the same time together as guests in Stephen Kuffler's laboratory in Baltimore. Both teams found that pacemaker fibres in frog sinus venosus become hyperpolarised on vagus stimulation, thereby quelling their rhythmic activity. We in Baltimore also used tortoise sinus venosus preparations excised with vagi attached, thus following in the footsteps of Gaskell (1887). When that preparation was paced externally during vagus stimulation, the normally long-lasting action potential was foreshortened dramatically, and at the depth of vagal inhibition the tissue became inexcitable. McWilliam (1885) had previously observed that the sinus venosus of the eel's heart becomes similarly inexcitable during vagus stimulation. In interpreting our findings, we followed Burgen & Terroux in suggesting that vagus stimulation brings about an increase in potassium permeability. And we predicted that to account for the inexcitability of the sinus fibres, a substantial increase in the potassium permeability of the membrane would be necessary. That an increase in chloride permeability might also be involved was later ruled out (Hutter, 1961). We had the advantage of fore-knowledge: as soon as I had returned to University College London in the summer of 1955, I approached E. J. Harries, then in the Biophysics Unit, to teach me how to conduct ion flux measurement on sinus venosus. That he did most willingly, and he also kindly put his equipment at my disposal. Duly, we found that the potassium permeability of the sinus venosus of the tortoise and of the frog heart, as measured either by the rate of influx or efflux of 42K, is greatly increased by ACh (10−7 to 2 × 10−6 g ml−1) (Harris & Hutter, 1956; Hutter, 1957). To establish that the increase in potassium permeability observed on treatment with ACh is of physiological significance, I also measured the efflux of 42K from frog sinus venosus preparations before, during and after stimulation of the attached vagus (Fig. 1). Again, the rate of efflux was greatly increased during vagal stimulation; and atropine duly blocked this effect (Harris & Hutter, 1956; Hutter, 1961). So we may be confident that an increase in potassium permeability plays an important part in nervous inhibition at least in the classical frog heart–vagus preparation. Effect of vagus stimulation on efflux of 42K from frog sinus venosus Abscissae, time from removal of the preparation from Ringer solution made with 2.7 mm labelled K+. Left ordinate, radioactivity of tissue on a logarithmic scale, obtained by adding together the activity of successive samples of wash solution and the final tissue count. Right ordinate, fraction of the labelled K+ remaining in tissue lost per minute. During the third wash period with inactive Ringer solution the left vagus was stimulated at 10 s−1. Most of the nerve and the stimulating electrodes were in a side bath separated by a Vaseline barrier. Since those early years, much more has been discovered about the nature of cardiac pacemaker activity. As the ionic currents involved in the generation of the pacemaker potential multiplied, so did the potential mechanisms by which vagal activity and ACh might inhibit the heart, providing fertile ground for controversies. Two recent publications illustrate a present dispute. On the one hand, Wilfried Jänig (2011) has highlighted the view (Bywater et al. 1989; Campbell et al. 1989) that neurally released ACh, by acting on discreet pools of novel sub-synaptic receptors, inhibits pace-making by suppressing inward current flow whereas applied ACh, by contrast, causes hyperpolarization by increasing outward current flow. On the other hand, Han & Bolter (2011) hold that muscarinic-activated channels conducting outward potassium current always play a primary role in vagal slowing of pacemaker activity. This conclusion was based in part on their finding that tertiapin-Q, a selective direct blocker of KACh channels, is just as effective in abolishing the effects of vagal stimulation as those of applied ACh. Measurements of ion fluxes are no longer in fashion. Yet they remain the most direct and specific method for studying ionic permeability. Moreover, just a few milligrams of tissue suffice for measurements of 42K efflux. So, if that powerful method were used to study the effect of vagus stimulation also on the mammalian preparations now mostly under investigation, it might yet help to resolve persistent uncertainties, including the still debated question of whether reduction of the pacemaker current If (DiFracesco & Tromba, 1987) takes precedence over an increase in IKACh, or not. That is a challenge surely not beyond the wit or ken of present-day workers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207