MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127308214

Estimating the value of reliability for business customers

2004· article· en· W2127308214 on OpenAlexaff
K.H. Tiedemann

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberian dollarReliability (semiconductor)Valuation (finance)Activity-based costingComputer scienceBusinessActuarial scienceOperations researchReliability engineeringMarketingEngineeringFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of papers have examined the costs of business electrical outages, although the literature is not as extensive as that for costs of residential outages. Two main methods are generally employed to estimate outage costs. First, customers are provided with several scenarios that vary by such factors as outage length, season of the year and time of day, and customers are asked to assign a dollar value to these costs (direct cost method). Second, customers are asked to indicate how much they would pay to avoid a particular outage scenario (contingent valuation method). This paper uses both methods to estimate outage costs for business customers and then uses regression analysis to examine the determinants of outage costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power SystemsSame topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207