Les facteurs discriminants sur les plans personnel, familial et scolaire entre les troubles de comportement intériorisés, extériorisés et concomitants chez des élèves de première secondaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche vise à identifier les facteurs de risque personnels, familiaux et associés à l'école chez des élèves en troubles du comportement intériorisés, extériorisés et en concomitance des troubles intériorisés et extériorisés. L'échantillon compte 242 élèves de première secondaire (12 et 13 ans) répartis en quatre types: 73 élèves présentent des troubles extériorisés, 77 élèves des troubles intériorisés, 14 élèves la concomitance des troubles; 78 élèves témoins sans trouble du comportement. Les résultats indiquent que les types concomitants et extériorisés sont comparables quant aux conduites antisociales, mais que le type concomitant présente plus de problèmes et se différencie de ce dernier type selon certaines variables. Le type intériorisé présente le plus de problèmes de communication avec ses parents, mais il est comparable aux élèves témoins pour les variables associées à l'école.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".