MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127369033 · doi:10.1029/2006gl027094

Exchange of sea ice between the Arctic Ocean and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago

2006· article· en· W2127369033 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Kwok

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceArctic ice packOceanographyArchipelagoArcticArctic geoengineeringArctic sea ice declineAntarctic sea iceSea ice thicknessClimatologyGeologyDrift iceFlux (metallurgy)Environmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First estimates of sea ice exchange between the Arctic Ocean and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) are obtained using six years (1997–2002) of RADARSAT ice motion. Over the period, the mean annual flux of sea ice area from the Amundsen Gulf (AG), M'Clure Strait (MS), and Queen Elizabeth Islands (QEI) are −85 ± 26 × 10 3 , −20 ± 24 × 10 3 , and 8 ± 6 × 10 3 km 2 . Positive/negative sign indicates Arctic outflow/inflow. Overall, net sea ice area is exported from the CAA; rough estimates suggest a mean annual volume flux of ∼10 2 km 3 into the Canada Basin. Ice types are largely seasonal near the AG flux gate, mixed seasonal and multiyear at the MS gate, and primarily multiyear at the QEI gates. Sea ice at the QEI flux gates remains land fast for most of the year. Cross‐strait gradient in sea level pressure explains more than 50% of the variance in the area flux at these passages. The role of ice exchange during the anomalous decrease in multiyear ice coverage in the Sverdrup Basin during September 1998 is examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207