Results from long-term measurement in piles of drag load and downdrag
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several full-scale, long-term tests on instrumented piles performed since the 1960s and through the 1990s are presented. The results of the tests show that a large drag load will develop in piles installed in soft and loose soils. The test cases are from Norway, Sweden, Japan, Canada, Australia, United States, and Singapore and involve driven steel piles and precast concrete piles. The test results show that the transfer of load from the soil to the pile through negative skin friction, and from the pile back to the soil through positive shaft resistance, is governed by effective stress and that already a very small movement will result in mobilization of ultimate values of shaft shear. The pile toe resistance, on the other hand, is determined by downdrag of the pile and the resulting pile toe penetration. Reconsolidation after the pile installation with associated dissipation of pore pressures will result in significant drag load. An equilibrium of force in the pile will develop, where the sustained loads on the pile head and the drag load are equal to the positive shaft resistance plus the pile toe resistance. The location of the force equilibrium, the neutral plane, is also where the pile and the soil move equally. The drag load is of importance mostly for very long piles (longer than 100 pile diameters) for which the pile structural strength could be exceeded. Downdrag, i.e., settlement of the piled foundation, is a very important issue, however, particularly for low-capacity short piles. Soil settlement at the neutral plane will result in a downdrag of the pile. The magnitude of the downdrag will determine the magnitude of the pile toe penetration into the soil, which will determine the pile toe resistance and affect the location of the neutral plane. Nature's iteration of force and soil settlement will decide the final location of the neutral plane.Key words: piles, negative skin friction, drag load, downdrag, neutral plane, pile settlement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".