Bibliographic record
Abstract
The risk of venous thromboembolism is increased during pregnancy. Although the absolute overall risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) in pregnancy is low, clinicians are highly vigilant to the development of this disease in pregnancy because of the severe consequences to both mother and child if this condition is not diagnosed, treated and prevented. Although prompt recognition and diagnosis of DVT or PE is critical to reduce maternal morbidity, diagnosis of both DVT and PE currently relies on data from studies in nonpregnant patients. However, there are some recent studies offering new insights in this area. The development of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy is influenced by inherent patient risk factors, pregnancy-associated risk factors, and the mode and type of delivery. The degree of risk increase from these factors individually and in combination, to warrant routine thromboprophylaxis, weighed against bleeding risks, is not yet defined. With increased use of assisted reproductive techniques to achieve pregnancy, clinicians must also be vigilant to the development of venous thrombosis in early pregnancy, occurring in unusual sites such as the upper extremities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".