MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127386899

원사기준 원산지기준의 경제효과 추정

2008· article· ko· W2127386899 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue관세학회지 · 2008
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRules of originClothingInternational tradeOrder (exchange)Government (linguistics)EconomicsBusinessInternational economicsFree tradeEconomyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FTAs need to introduce rules of origin (ROO) in order to curb trade deflection. ROO should be designed to be neutral and modest forms, but many countries tend to adopt complicated forms of ROO from the viewpoint of protective trade policy. Typically, Canada and US prefer yam-forward rule as the ROO on textile and apparel, which is the most complicated ROO in FTAs. This paper tries to assess the effects of yam-forward rule on the trade of textile and apparel in the Canada-Korea FTA. Although several papers on ROO in FTAs were published, empirical studies on sectoral effects of ROO in FTAs are quite limited. Maybe this paper can be the first study in Korea on the quantitative assessment of ROO on individual industry. The paper suggests that the government of Korea persuade Canada to adopt less stringent type of ROO in the bilateral FTA between two countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it