MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127412486 · doi:10.1109/wiiat.2008.383

Privacy with Web Serivces: Intelligence Gathering and Enforcement

2008· article· en· W2127412486 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Bodorik, Dawn Jutla

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAccess Control and Trust
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWeb serviceWorld Wide WebPrivacy policyInformation privacyEnforcementPrivacy softwareWS-PolicyContext (archaeology)Computer securityPrivacy by DesignInternet privacyWeb application securityWeb development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on agent-based enterprise information technology infrastructure support for privacy in the Web services architecture (WSA) in order to enforce privacy policies on private information (PI) used by applications. We provision the Web services platform (WSP) with mechanisms to not only enforce privacy policies on PI used by a Web service, but also gather intelligence about PI that is exchanged in invoking and executing Web services. Gathered information written in logs is then analyzed by a privacy agent to update a privacy knowledge base (KB) that captures information on applications, Web services they invoke, context of invocation, and PI stored, managed, and used by the enterprise. This loop-observe execution of Web services, update the knowledge base with observations, and then update rules governing privacy enforcement, provides for adaptive learning about the use of PI in the organization and also enforcement of privacy policies in Web services executions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAccess Control and TrustFrench-language works237,207