MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2127433765 · doi:10.1115/1.1825442

An Optimality Criterion for the Structural Optimization of Machine Elements

2005· article· en· W2127433765 on OpenAlexaff
Chin-Pun Teng, Jorge Angeles

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Design · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStiffnessReduction (mathematics)Dimension (graph theory)Optimization problemEngineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringMathematical optimizationMechanical engineeringControl theory (sociology)Engineering drawingMathematicsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Methods of structural optimization have been studied and developed over the last three decades. An important aspect of structural optimization pertains to the condition under which the loads are applied. Most machine structures in operation are subject to loads varying as functions of time. In this paper, a novel approach is proposed to cope with loads whose magnitudes vary within given bounds and with variable directions. The underlying ideas are applied to the structural optimization of the roller-carrying disk of a novel class of cam-follower speed reduction devices termed Speed-o-Cam (SoC). Results obtained in this paper are compared with a current prototype and with an intermediate design in which the dimensions of the roller pins are optimized. Combined with the optimum dimension of the roller pins, our structural-optimization results lead to an improvement of almost twice the stiffness with a mass reduction of 40% of the original prototype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mechanical DesignSame topicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations ResearchFrench-language works237,207