EMERGENT FLUCTUATIONS IN THE TRAJECTORIES OF AGENT COLLECTIVES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characteristics of the collective behavior of groups have been studied in diverse disciplines; in this work, we present an approach grounded in robotics. We first specify a model for collective behavior based on a formulation of a multi-agent robotic system. In contrast to some models found in the literature, we do not use stochastic mechanisms to introduce fluctuations. Rather, we present a fully deterministic model where fluctuations emerge due to the complex dynamics of a high-dimensional coupling of dynamical systems. We investigate the emergence of fluctuations in the trajectories of individual agents about the group average trajectory, and present an illustration of the onset of these fluctuations as inter-agent coupling is increased. A selection of behavioral modes are also provided, illustrating the nature of these fluctuations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it